Comparison of Immunohistochemistry and Direct Sanger Sequencing for Detection of the BRAFV600E Mutation in Thyroid Neoplasm

BACKGROUND The BRAF(V600E) mutation is the most common genetic alteration identified in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). Because of its costs effectiveness and sensitivity, direct Sanger sequencing has several limitations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of immunohistochemistry (IHC) as an alternative method to detect the BRAF(V600E) mutation in preoperative and postoperative tissue samples. METHODS We evaluated 71 patients who underwent thyroid surgery with the result of direct sequencing of the BRAF(V600E) mutation. IHC staining of the BRAF(V600E) mutation was performed in 49 preoperative and 23 postoperative thyroid specimens. RESULTS Sixty-two patients (87.3%) had PTC, and of these, BRAF(V600E) was confirmed by direct sequencing in 57 patients (91.9%). In 23 postoperative tissue samples, the BRAF(V600E) mutation was detected in 16 samples (70%) by direct sequencing and 18 samples (78%) by IHC. In 24 fine needle aspiration (FNA) samples, BRAF(V600E) was detected in 18 samples (75%) by direct sequencing and 16 samples (67%) by IHC. In 25 core needle biopsy (CNB) samples, the BRAF(V600E) mutation was detected in 15 samples (60%) by direct sequencing and 16 samples (64%) by IHC. The sensitivity and specificity of IHC for detecting the BRAF(V600E) mutation were 77.8% and 66.7% in FNA samples and 99.3% and 80.0% in CNB samples. CONCLUSION IHC could be an alternative method to direct Sanger sequencing for BRAF(V600E) mutation detection both in postoperative and preoperative samples. However, application of IHC to detect the BRAF(V600E) mutation in FNA samples is of limited value compared with direct sequencing.